News

Here’s how the footprint of the plant-based Impossible Burger compares to beef

p-1-90322572-impossible

A new analysis finds that the environmental cost of raising cattle is very, very high.

The newest version of the Impossible Burger–the plant-based meat that uses food science to replicate the taste and feel of beef–has a carbon footprint 89% smaller than a burger made from a cow.

A new analysis found that the burger also uses 87% less water than beef, uses 96% less land, and cuts water contamination by 92%. Those numbers are improvements on the last iteration of the burger, in part because the company has become more efficient as it grows and because it switched from wheat to soy as a key ingredient, because soy also yields more acres on a farm. But the majority of the impact simply comes from the fact that the product isn’t made from an animal.

 

By Adele Peters

Sorry, we couldn't find any posts. Please try a different search.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.