News
After Mayo, Patent Office Will Require ‘Significantly More’ than a Law of Nature for Patentability
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., may affect the ability of companies to protect valuable innovations emerging from basic research. The Court, on March 20, 2012, found that Prometheus Laboratories Inc.’s claimed method was unpatentable because it attempted to monopolize a law of nature. The U.S. Patent Office has advised patent examiners that patent claims must amount to "significantly more" than a law of nature, natural phenomenon, or abstract idea.
Kimton Eng
Partner
Jennifer Lane Spaith
Associate
Elen Wetzel
Associate
Read the full article here. https://clients.dorsey.com/rs/vm.ashx?ct=24F76B14D5AE4EE0CCD189ABD42E921A91907ABFDA9818CF5AE175767CEAC80BDF41A
MATR Supporters (view all)