News
University of Montana, Providence announce new rural health care collaborative RESOLVE

“When you’ve got a solo practitioner at Wolf Point, Plentywood, how do we keep them from feeling isolated?” UM Health and Medicine Director Reed Humphrey offered.
RESOLVE is a new collaboration between the University of Montana and Providence that seeks to shine a spotlight on those living outside of big cities.
Using Providence’s data, UM can research ways to better help people in rural areas receive support or treatment.
“Rural communities face a lot of unique health challenges. It’s a combination of the type of health conditions, the chronic health conditions that they have, and the resources available to manage those conditions,” Providence Chief Resource Officer Bill Wright told MTN.
“Allows our researchers to broaden the kinds of research experiences that they can have,” UM VP of Research and Creative Scholarship Scott Whittenburg added.
By: Emily Brown
Montana’s Billings Clinic is Training Future Rural Providers
In a national shortage of rural doctors, Billings Clinic is training–and retaining–physicians where they’re needed most.
Looking Back to Move Forward: Reflections of PBRN Directors
Abstract
This article looks back on the story of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN) and its successor, the National Research Network (NRN), through the eyes of its leaders during the first 40 years. Facilitated conversations over 2 years iteratively coalesced key facts and patterns in this collective account of what they had observed. Time-durable patterns observed are distilled for interpretation and application by contemporary practice-based research network (PBRN) leaders as they move forward. Looking back is done via developmental eras. The ASPN was proposed in 1978 as a set of change strategies for primary care research, ASPN gathered momentum through efforts of individuals, institutions, and small grants that mobilized enthusiasm and commitment in the face of headwinds. The network expanded into the research mainstream from 1988, addressing large socially important questions with greater acceptance and volume of PBRN research. The ASPN is now in an era of scaling up and adapting to huge technological, organizational, and business shifts and a growing emphasis on patient and community engagement, safety, and disparities. Archetypal dilemmas and balances that emerged and reemerged across these eras are distilled, along with ways they were addressed at the time. The authors then project their 40-year experience to future vistas they believe the PBRN value proposition can be adapted and extended; what they regard as promising directions future leaders to take.




